From the blog

What is an applicant tracking system, and what does it do to your resume?

An ATS is a database with a workflow on top. What happens to your file when you hit submit, what the software almost never does, and which systems Australian employers actually run.

4 min read · Jul 27, 2026

An applicant tracking system is a database with a workflow bolted on. It takes your file, pulls the text out, files it against the job you applied for, and lets a recruiter search the pile. Automatic screening is one setting inside it, and it has to be deliberately switched on.

Which makes it a much duller thing than its reputation, and a lot easier to work with once you know what it's doing.

What it actually is

Strip away the marketing and there are five parts:

  • A job record, called a requisition, for each vacancy.
  • A candidate record for you, linked to that job.
  • A way to get your application in, usually a form plus a file upload.
  • Stages you get moved between, with a status against your name.
  • Templated email, which is where your acknowledgement and your rejection both come from.

That's it. Everything else is an add-on an employer chooses to switch on or leave alone.

What happens to your file when you hit submit

Your document doesn't get read the way you wrote it. The text is pulled out into a single stream, then the software tries to work out which bits are your name, your jobs, your dates and your qualifications, and drops them into fields. That's the step people mean when they talk about formatting, and it's the only step where your layout matters at all.

Five stages between hitting submit and a decision. You submit the form and file. The text is pulled out of the file. The record is stored and made searchable. A recruiter searches and reads. A human decides. Only the screening questions on the first stage are commonly automated; the last two stages are people. 1. You submit form + file 2. Text pulled out of the file 3. Stored and searchable 4. Recruiter searches, reads 5. A person decides Where the automatic rejections happen Your formatting only matters at stage 2. Your answers on the form only matter at stage 1. Stages 4 and 5 are people. Drawn from four vendors' own documentation and our own extraction testing.
Where the software stops and the people start. A lot of "beat the ATS" advice is aimed at stages that are already human.

How much of it is actually automated

Less than you'd think. Enhancv surveyed 25 recruiters in the United States in November 2025, across technology, healthcare, finance, publishing and retail, using more than ten different platforms between them. Ninety-two per cent said their systems do not automatically reject applications on formatting, design, missing keywords or a low match score. The 8 per cent who did use automatic rejection said they used it only for roles with highly specific requirements.

Forty-four per cent of the platforms they used do offer an automated "fit score". Most of those recruiters either turn it off or treat it as a rough guide. One of them, a recruitment relationship manager at Allegis Global Solutions, put it plainly: "ATS systems don't automatically disposition people, we have to go in and do it ourselves."

Small survey, American, and self-reported. We'd rather give you a real number with its limits attached than a rounder one with nothing behind it.

Which ones you'll actually meet in Australia

Much of the advice you'll read names American systems. Here are the ones an Australian applicant actually runs into, and you can usually tell which you're in from the web address:

  • PageUp, Melbourne-founded, heavily used across government, health and universities.
  • JobAdder, an Australian system used heavily by recruitment agencies.
  • Workday and SAP SuccessFactors, the big enterprise platforms. A Workday careers page has myworkdayjobs.com in the address.
  • ELMO, Employment Hero, LiveHire, Scout Talent and Expr3ss!, all Australian, common in mid-sized employers.

SEEK sits in front of most of them, pushing applications through into the employer's own system. So the file you upload to SEEK is usually the file that gets pulled apart at the other end.

Where the scary statistic came from

You'll have seen the claim that 75 per cent of resumes are never seen by a human. People have tried to trace it, and the trail runs back to a sales pitch in 2012 by a company called Preptel, which sold resume optimisation. Preptel was out of business by 2013, and no method was ever published to back the number up.

It's worth noticing who repeats it. In that same recruiter survey, 20 per cent blamed career coaches and resume-writing services for spreading it, usually while selling a template that solves it.

Where to go from here

Three things follow from all this, and each has its own piece:

The short version

  • An ATS is a database with a workflow on it. Storing and searching is the point; screening is an optional setting.
  • Your formatting matters at one stage only, when the text is pulled out of your file.
  • In a survey of 25 US recruiters, 92 per cent said their systems don't auto-reject on formatting, keywords or scores.
  • In Australia you're most likely dealing with PageUp, JobAdder, Workday or SuccessFactors, usually fed from SEEK.
  • The 75 per cent claim traces to a 2012 sales pitch by a company that folded the next year.

Want us to look at yours?

Honestly, this is the part we enjoy. Send us your resume and the ad through the free review and a writer will pull the text out of it, show you what the machine gets, and tell you what they'd change. It costs nothing and it's yours whether or not you ever buy anything.

If you'd rather hand the whole thing over, here's what we do. We'd love to make you the shoo-in.

Put it to work.

The free review applies everything above to your actual document.

Start my free review